Antitrust and Competition Law
As a “highly recommended”* antitrust law practice, Butler Rubin provides clients with more than 30 years of counseling and courtroom experience representing businesses on both the plaintiff and defendant sides of complex antitrust and other competition-related matters. Unlike many other law firms with expertise in these areas, the firm not only counsels clients in the area but also regularly litigates antitrust cases.
Areas of Service
- Antitrust Litigation – from the initiation of litigation through trial, we are experienced in all areas of antitrust litigation including issues such as jurisdictional challenges, Twombly motions, summary judgment motions, class certification challenges, Daubert challenges and motions in limine. Our goal is to streamline litigation and create the most efficient (and favorable) resolution for clients.
- Opt-Out Litigation – helping corporate counsel and their organizations assess opt-out risks and rewards, and make well-informed decisions about whether or not to opt- out of antitrust class litigation through assessment, risk/reward analysis and litigation.
- Antitrust Counseling – counseling on pricing, information exchange, supply and distribution chain management, trade association activity, dealer relations, and agreements with competitors.
- Antitrust Investigations – providing antitrust training seminars and compliance audits, representing both companies and individuals in criminal antitrust matters, responding to subpoenas, civil investigative demands and grand jury summonses in federal and state antitrust investigations.
- Unfair Competition Litigation – representing clients in a wide variety of antitrust, good faith and fair dealing, business tort and dealer litigation including injunctions, trial and appeal. Over the past several years, we’ve litigated several high-profile antitrust cases involving national and international monopolies and contracts.
- Trade Secrets/Business Torts Counseling and Litigation – from structuring relationships with new or existing employees, contract review and trade secret protection strategies through litigating matters for breach of agreement, misappropriation of trade secrets and employee theft.
- Franchise/Distribution Relations – helping clients who are in a position to either add or terminate new dealers or franchisees. This comprehensive analysis provides a summary of industry-specific state laws, outlines relevant case law across one state or all 50 states, and develops a case-specific approach to minimizing a company’s legal risks.
From our first antitrust case as counsel for the plaintiff in the ground-breaking case Spray-Rite v. Monsanto to our representation of a Fortune 500 company in In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, we have litigated competition disputes to a successful conclusion for a wide variety of companies.
- Represented LCD manufacturer in opt-out litigation involving alleged price-fixing (Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., N.D. Ill.).
- Defended a company accused of price fixing in the automobile and truck industries (In re Aftermarket Filters Antitrust Litigation, N.D. Ill.).
- Defended a market maker in private litigation alleging a conspiracy discriminating against certain options traders. (Last Atlantis v. Chicago Bd. Of Options Exchange, N.D. Ill.).
- Defended an insurer accused of conspiring to prevent issuance of surety bonds to municipality (Guarantee Co. of America v. City of Grand Rapids, W.D., MI.).
- Represented an opt-out antitrust plaintiff in a case accusing the corrugated industry of coordinated downtime at its mills (In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation, E.D. PA.).
- Represented and advised a class member regarding opt-out options and in securing a settlement with the credit card industry in connection with claims of unlawful coordination on debit card fees (In re Visa/MasterCard Antitrust Litigation, E.D. NY).
- Prevented former employee of an on-line trading company from disclosing key company secrets, including salary and other compensation information he unlawfully obtained concerning the company’s top executives.
- Advised a national magazine distributor faced with a competitor’s interference with contracts essential to the distributor’s business.
- Represented Fortune 500 company as opt-out plaintiff in massive civil litigation to recover damages from multi-national manufacturers convicted of fixing prices on items used in the production of its goods. (In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, D.D.C.).
- Represented an executive of a meat processing corporation targeted in an investigation of an alleged conspiracy to restrain trade in the foodstuffs industry.
- Prosecuted an unfair competition case on behalf of largest franchisee in retread tire industry against market leader (Treadco v. Bandag, American Arbitration Association).
- Defended a manufacturer in dealer termination litigation alleging violation of franchise and antitrust laws. (Argo Int’l v. Viking Pump, N.J.).
As part of our practice, our lawyers are active in leadership positions in the antitrust industry and various trade groups including the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, the Council on Antitrust & Unfair Competition Law of the Illinois State Bar Association, and the Chicago Bar Association’s Antitrust Committee. Before joining Butler Rubin, members of the practice held positions in the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the offices of State Attorneys General.
*Rated as a “highly recommended” Antitrust Law Practice by international publication, Global Competition Law 100.
Some of the content on this site is considered Attorney Advertising under the applicable rules of certain states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Butler Rubin assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or timeliness of any information provided herein. The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice or a substitute for legal counsel.
Online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Accordingly, do not use any of the supplied e-mail interfaces to send us any confidential information until you speak with one of our attorneys and receive our authorization to send that information to us.
Sites listed as hypertext links herein are not under the control of Butler Rubin. Accordingly, Butler Rubin can make no representation concerning the quality, safety or suitability of the content of these sites nor can the fact that Butler Rubin has included this link serve as an endorsement by Butler Rubin of any of these sites. Butler Rubin is providing this site, the information, listings, and links contained herein only as a convenience to you.
Some of the content of this site is considered advertising material under the applicable rules of certain states. The content, original images and their arrangement herein are protected and owned by Butler Rubin.
2. Information collected
We may collect the following personal data when you visit our website: (a) Personal data provided when you complete forms available on our website; (b) Personal data you provide when you contact us; (c) Personal data relating to: (i) your application for employment at Butler Rubin, (ii) our Diversity Scholar award; and/or (iii) your attendance at a Butler Rubin event; (d) Details of visits to our website, including the volume of traffic received, logs and the resources which have been accessed.
3. How we use your information
We use information you provide to better understand your needs and provide you with better service. With the exception of vendors providing hosting, database management and development services related to the operation of these websites, we will not disclose, sell or rent any of your personal data to any third party unless approved by you or required by law.
4. Transfer of personal data
5. Links to other sites
We may provide links to other websites for your information or convenience. Such websites are independently operated and not under our control. We are not responsible for the content of these websites or any products or services offered through them.
8. Our commitment to data security
To prevent unauthorized access, maintain data accuracy, and ensure the correct use of information, the Firm uses commercially appropriate physical, electronic, and managerial procedures to safeguard and secure the information we collect online. Unfortunately, the transmission of information via the Internet is not completely secure. However, we have put in place various security procedures as set out in this policy. Although we will do our best to protect your personal data, we cannot guarantee the security of your data transmitted to our website; any transmission is at your own risk. Once we have received your information, we will use strict procedures and security features to try to prevent unauthorized access.
9. Our commitment to children’s privacy
We do not seek to collect or maintain information on our website from those we know are under 18, and no part of our website is structured to attract anyone under 13.
The Extranet is a secure (password-protected) and private (client-specific) portal for Butler Rubin’s clients who want to share information directly with the firm. Butler Rubin’s Extranet uses SSL encryption to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of all communications between your web browser and our Extranet server.